Case V — Led to Law
Eric Tennant
Bridgeport, West Virginia · Prior Authorization Denial · Liver Cancer
This case became law.
Eric Tennant died on September 17, 2025. Six months later, his wife Becky testified before the West Virginia legislature. The bill passed unanimously. Governor Patrick Morrisey signed it on March 31, 2026. It takes effect June 10, 2026. Eric didn't survive the delay. The law is what Becky promised him it would be.
The Story
Eric Tennant was 58 years old — a coal-mining safety instructor from Bridgeport, West Virginia. When his doctors found a cancerous tumor in his liver, they recommended histotripsy: a $50,000 noninvasive procedure that uses focused ultrasound waves to target and break down tissue without surgery. His family wasn't expecting a cure. They wanted more time.
His insurer said no. The denial language was familiar: "not medically necessary." Then a second label: "experimental and investigational." Becky Tennant filed appeals. She submitted medical records, expert opinions, and published data. She contacted nearly every state representative she could reach. Nothing moved.
The insurer reversed its denial in late May 2025 — but only after KFF Health News and NBC News began asking questions about the case. Media pressure accomplished what the appeals process could not. Within one week of the reversal, Eric was hospitalized. By midsummer, he was no longer a candidate for the procedure. The window the delay closed never reopened.
The Timeline
Cancerous liver tumor identified. Doctors recommend histotripsy — a noninvasive, ultrasound-based procedure to target and shrink the tumor.
Insurer denies histotripsy as "not medically necessary" and "experimental and investigational." Becky begins filing appeals, submitting records, expert opinions, and data. Contacts nearly every state legislator she can find.
Appeals produce nothing. No state representative can intervene. The system holds.
KFF Health News and NBC News begin reporting on the case. The insurer reverses its denial — not because of the appeals, not because of legislative pressure, but because reporters started asking questions.
Eric is hospitalized. The reversal that came too late becomes undeniable.
Eric is no longer a candidate for histotripsy. The door Becky spent months trying to open is now permanently closed.
Eric Tennant dies.
Six months after Eric's death, Becky testifies before the West Virginia legislature. The bill passes unanimously.
Gov. Patrick Morrisey signs the bill into law.
Law takes effect.
What It Actually Took to Get the Denial Reversed
Becky Tennant submitted medical records. She submitted expert opinions and peer-reviewed data. She appealed multiple times. She contacted nearly every state representative in West Virginia. None of it worked.
What worked was journalists. The insurer reversed its decision in late May 2025 — only after KFF Health News and NBC News began asking questions about the case.
That is not a success story for the appeals process. That is a documented confession that the appeals process failed, and that the mechanism which actually produced the reversal was public accountability — not the system that is supposed to protect patients. Eric Tennant didn't have access to that lever until it was too late. Most patients never do.
Becky's Words to Lawmakers
"The insurance company's decision did not simply delay care. It closed doors."
— Becky Tennant, testimony before the West Virginia legislature
Becky made a promise to Eric in his final hospital stay — that she would at least try to change it. She kept that promise. The bill passed unanimously. The governor signed it. It is now the law of West Virginia.
What the Law Does — and What It Doesn't
The West Virginia law allows patients who have already received prior authorization for one treatment to pursue a less expensive alternative without restarting the entire approval process. It eliminates a specific redundancy that penalizes patients for choosing a more cost-effective option once they've already cleared the prior authorization barrier.
What it covers
- Eliminates redundant prior authorization when switching to a less expensive alternative to an already-approved treatment
- Passed unanimously in both chambers
- Signed March 31, 2026 — effective June 10, 2026
What it doesn't cover
- Applies to state employees only — not private insurance broadly
- Does not address the initial denial that cost Eric his window
- Does not prohibit "experimental and investigational" denials for FDA-cleared procedures
- Does not create liability for delays that close clinical windows
It is a narrow law. Becky Tennant would be the first to say so. It won't bring Eric back. But she made a promise, and she kept it. The work of making it broader — and federal — is what remains.
Why This Case Belongs on This Page
Eric Tennant's case illustrates two patterns that run through every case in this room. First, the delay-as-denial mechanism: the denial didn't have to hold permanently to cause irreversible harm. The window it closed was clinical and time-bound. By the time the reversal came, the procedure was no longer an option.
Second, the accountability gap: the appeals process — the system patients are told will protect them — failed completely. What finally moved the insurer wasn't data, wasn't physician documentation, wasn't legislative pressure. It was journalists. The Clinical Integrity Amendment's Prior Knowledge Omission provision addresses the first failure. Closing the legal gap that lets insurers cause irreversible harm and face no consequences addresses the second.
Has this happened to you?
Every documented case adds to the evidentiary record. Your story matters.